Saturday, January 12, 2013

Week 1 Blog 1 Literacy Philosophy


Blog # 1    Teaching Literacy:  A Shift in Philosophy

 

I spoke with a teacher who has taught at my school for about twenty years.  She has seen literacy instruction move from being developed almost completely by the teacher to being tightly scheduled and often times scripted.  She has adopted elements of both in her philosophy of teaching literacy.   

When she began, there were no curricula used for literacy.  Teachers used the reader’s workshop and writer’s workshop formats and created their own lesson plans based on students’ needs.  Literacy instruction was also heavily integrated into other content areas.  There was no schedule to follow, beyond arriving to lunch and specials at an appointed time.  There was even recess!

By seven years ago, instruction had changed tremendously.  Reading was taught in a ninety minute block.  A detailed schedule, developed by a consultant of the district, outlined what was to be taught from the reading curriculum each day.  Students also received an additional forty-five minute reading intervention.  All of these were scripted programs, to be followed exactly. 

Teachers, including the teacher with whom I spoke, balked at the restrictive nature of the new schedule.  They disliked and disagreed with the absence of teacher-made decisions, the constant data meetings, and lack of freedom to focus on student interests…But our CSAP scores went up.  Dramatically.  We went from a school on the brink of being closed down or taken over by a charter to being considered a school of average performance in three years.

  Both of these teaching experiences have influenced her philosophy of teaching literacy.  Our students are almost all English language learners and over ninety-five percent come from a background of poverty.  They start school at a disadvantage.  It is essential that we utilize the time we have with them effectively.  She has come to appreciate the scope and sequences used to ensure teachers are meeting the state standards for each grade level.  The scripted interventions have been successful.  The scripted, consistent, language helps our English language learners more easily focus on the content of the lessons.  Instruction that is guided more by student interests and observed student needs is used during writer’s workshop.  This is when teachers and students get to show their creativity.  The teacher I spoke with believes in doing what works for children.  The children she works with are more successful in a highly structured environment.     

2 comments:

  1. Cheryl -

    This is why curriculum is so important in education. We want to make the most of the time we have with kids. Can it sometimes go crazy with too much testing, sure. But with a curriculum that includes structure so that students are focused, there can be great gains. Your final point works along side the focused curriculum as it allows the teacher to adapt with student interest that is personal to each class as sometimes the things that work one year don't the next.
    - Matt

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Cheryl,

    What a wonderful person to interview. Seeing how curriculum and instruction has changed over the years from someone who has experienced it is an eye opener. As teachers, we all balk at change, because it seems to be a constant and hard to keep up with all the demands. However, the outcome of a rigorous and structured curriculum has shown student growth through assessments and proven to be successful. As teachers, we can take the curriculum and modify it for our students and find ways to incorporate student interest and "fun" in their days. Thank you for sharing these ways of taking structure and making it work for each student and each class.

    Amberlyn

    ReplyDelete